The deadline to fund the government arrives, and Congress still hasn’t agreed on next year’s budget. Instead of a shutdown, the news reports that lawmakers passed something called a continuing resolution. Most people nod along without really knowing what just happened.

What does “continuing resolution” mean?

A continuing resolution is a temporary law that keeps federal agencies funded at existing levels. Congress uses it when a full budget hasn’t passed by the deadline. It buys time rather than solving the underlying disagreement. Funding continues, usually unchanged from the prior year, for a set number of weeks or months. The term applies specifically to this stopgap measure, not to the full-year budget that’s supposed to eventually replace it.

Where did the term come from?

The practice goes back to the 1870s, when Congress first passed short-term funding measures during budget disputes. “Continuing resolution” became standard congressional language later, in the 20th century. That’s when the annual appropriations process grew more complex, and missed deadlines became more common. Using one has since become a routine part of how Congress handles funding fights. It’s no longer treated as a rare emergency measure.

How does a continuing resolution actually work?

Congress is supposed to pass twelve separate appropriations bills each year, one for each major area of federal spending. Lawmakers sometimes can’t finish that work before the fiscal year ends. When that happens, a continuing resolution keeps money flowing at roughly the prior year’s levels. It avoids the immediate alternative: agencies running out of legal authority to spend money at all.

A continuing resolution isn’t a substitute for the real budget process. It generally freezes spending at old levels and blocks new programs. That’s because it’s meant to preserve the status quo, not make new policy choices. Agencies dislike relying on them repeatedly for that same reason. Planning and hiring get harder when funding renews in short bursts instead of a predictable annual cycle.

Sometimes Congress can’t even agree on a continuing resolution before funding runs out. The result then is a government shutdown. Non-essential staff get furloughed, and many government functions pause. That continues until lawmakers pass either a new continuing resolution or the full budget itself. Avoiding exactly that outcome is the resolution’s entire purpose.

A concrete example

Congress reaches the end of the fiscal year without finishing its appropriations bills. Rather than let the government shut down, lawmakers pass a continuing resolution. It extends current funding levels for another 45 days. Federal agencies keep operating normally during that window. Negotiators, meanwhile, keep working toward a full budget agreement, or toward yet another short-term extension once the new deadline arrives.

What it’s not

A continuing resolution isn’t the same as a government shutdown. A shutdown happens specifically when no funding measure passes at all. It’s also not identical to a full appropriations bill. A resolution generally just extends existing funding, rather than setting new spending levels or priorities. And it isn’t a permanent fix, either. Every continuing resolution comes with its own expiration date. That just relocates the same funding deadline further down the calendar.

Where you’ll encounter it

News coverage brings up the term constantly whenever a federal funding deadline approaches. It also surfaces in discussions about dysfunction in the congressional budget process. Relying on repeated short-term resolutions, instead of full-year budgets, has become a recurring point of criticism from both parties. Watch for the phrase again whenever a fall deadline approaches and full-year spending bills still haven’t cleared Congress.

Related terms

• Cookie Tracking (L27)
• Lobbying (L28)
• Filibuster (L29)